My post about 'celebrinerd' has been linked in both editor-Amy-from-Ohio's post about 'celebrinerd' and Josh's post about 'celebrinerd'. I'm in the (very small and obscure corner of the) big time now!
Editor-Amy-from-Ohio also mentions that Cathy suggests creating wikipedia and urban dictionary entries for celebrinerd. This is a fine idea, as it gives celebrinerd a larger number of distinct URLs, and it would give us all a new place to which to link the word 'celebrinerd'.
It turns out that someone(s) went ahead and took Cathy's suggestion: celebrinerd! celebrinerd!
To make Mr. Jennings task a bit easier, that's eight occurences of 'celebrinerd' in this post alone (nine now), five of which link to distinct URLs.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(40)
-
▼
September
(26)
- Belated Birthday Notice
- The Media Sucks. No. The Media Suck.
- The importance of property rights [updated]
- One last time with celebrinerd
- Promises, promises... (pt. 2)
- Programming, perception, and a priori postulates
- Tortured legal reasoning
- Once more with the celebrinerd...
- Links! Lots of links will bring 'celebrinerd' to t...
- Doing my part
- I can't stop me that easily!
- Prefiero carnitas
- Addendum to yesterday's post (updated)
- Slow and steady wins the race, right?
- Big Cats
- Clarification of an off-hand comment
- The New Look: Awesome
- Ultimate Hype!
- 'Ernesto' se traduce como 'Dick'?
- The Cognitive Lunch Shark Tank
- General Recognition Theory
- Promises, promises...
- The source, and justification, of rights
- Some bias with a late night snack
- Some bias with breakfast
- The only winning advice
-
▼
September
(26)
No comments:
Post a Comment